Compare Oppo R1 R829T vs Nubia Z11 miniS

Feature Comparison

  • Nubia Z11 miniS's Screen Size is 3.0% more
  • Nubia Z11 miniS's 64GB Internal Storage is more than Oppo R1 R829T's 16GB Internal Storage
  • Nubia Z11 miniS has 75.0% more RAM
 
Oppo R1 R829T
Nubia Z11 miniS
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
59 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
62 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 423.64 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 4GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 23MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch focus, Exposure compensation, Face detection, panorama, HDR, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Scene mode Face detection, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Digital zoom, ISO Settings, Geo tagging, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Self timer, HDR, Scene mode, Touch focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) nubia UI 4.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.7 x 70.4 x 7.1 146.06 x 72.14 x 7.6   
Weight
141 grams 158 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gray, Moon Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Unibody Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Cover -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 200GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2410mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Oppo R1 R829T vs Nubia Z11 miniS Specs

Specs
Oppo R1 R829TNubia Z11 miniS  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP23MP  
RAM 1GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2410mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  

Nubia Z11 miniS Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Good camera & gaming performance
  • Battery lasts throughout the day
The Bad
  • Lacks NFC support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo R1 R829T with Nubia Z11 miniS. When you see Oppo R1 R829T Vs Nubia Z11 miniS comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo R1 R829T stands against Nubia Z11 miniS and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo R1 R829T is currently Rs. 11,490. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page