Compare Oppo R1 R829T vs Samsung Galaxy Core 2

Feature Comparison

  • The Oppo R1 R829T has 5 inch Screen Size, which is 10.0% more
  • The Internal Storage on Oppo R1 R829T is 75.0% more
  • The RAM on Oppo R1 R829T is 25.0% more
 
Oppo R1 R829T
Samsung Galaxy Core 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
36 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
62 Value For Money Score
56 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 207 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek -   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 -   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 768MB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch focus, Exposure compensation, Face detection, panorama, HDR, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Scene mode Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 480p Video Recording   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope Accelerometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.7 x 70.4 x 7.1 130.3 x 68 x 9.8   
Weight
141 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Black, White   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Unibody Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories 6 Months Accessories Warranty   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Cover Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB 2GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 64GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2   
3G Bands
UMTS 2100 MHz HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2410mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Oppo R1 R829T vs Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Specs

Specs
Oppo R1 R829TSamsung Galaxy Core 2  
Screen Size 5 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  
RAM 1GB768MB  
Battery Capacity 2410mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP0.3MP  

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compact design
  • 3G connectivity
  • Dedicated Dual SIM slot and Micro SD expansion slot
The Bad
  • Poor battery life
  • Complains of poor touch calibration
  • Slow and sluggish performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo R1 R829T with Samsung Galaxy Core 2. When you see Oppo R1 R829T Vs Samsung Galaxy Core 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo R1 R829T stands against Samsung Galaxy Core 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo R1 R829T is currently Rs. 11,490. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page