Compare Oppo Yoyo R2001 vs Yu Yureka

Feature Comparison

  • Yu Yureka's Screen Size is 14.0% more
  • Yu Yureka has 16GB Internal Storage, whereas Oppo Yoyo R2001 has 4GB Internal Storage
  • Yu Yureka's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Oppo Yoyo R2001
Yu Yureka
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
234.4 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582M Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geotagging, Face detection, Touch focus, Panorama, HRD -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) Android (4.4)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
138.5 x 69.5 x 9.2 154.8 x 78 x 6-8.8   
Weight
145 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gray, White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on phone and 6 month on Accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Cover Device, Charger, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB 12GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 MHz HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Oppo Yoyo R2001 vs Yu Yureka Specs

Specs
Oppo Yoyo R2001Yu Yureka  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Yu Yureka Pros & Cons

The Good
  • CyanogenMod brings a ton of customizations
  • Smooth performer in day to day tasks with no visible stutter
  • Removable back panel and battery
  • Matt finishing on the back cover provides excellent grip
The Bad
  • The home button has no backlight
  • Tends to heat up when playing games
  • Low light shots from the rear camera have a lot of noise

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Yoyo R2001 with Yu Yureka. When you see Oppo Yoyo R2001 Vs Yu Yureka comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Yoyo R2001 stands against Yu Yureka and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page