Compare Panasonic Eluga Icon vs Lenovo Vibe P1m

Feature Comparison

  • Panasonic Eluga Icon has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Panasonic Eluga Icon is the same as Lenovo Vibe P1m
  • RAM of Panasonic Eluga Icon is the same as Lenovo Vibe P1m
 
Panasonic Eluga Icon
Lenovo Vibe P1m
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
97 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
58 Value For Money Score
55 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6752 MediaTek MT6735P   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T760 MP2 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
152.3 x 76.4 x 7.95 141 x 71.8 x 9.3   
Weight
147 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Slate, Gold Black, White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 1800(band 3) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3500mAh 3900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Panasonic Eluga Icon vs Lenovo Vibe P1m Specs

Specs
Panasonic Eluga IconLenovo Vibe P1m  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3500mAh3900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Lenovo Vibe P1m Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge 3900mAh battery helps it work longer
  • 16GB of Internal storage
  • Dual SIM 4G LTE Connectivity
The Bad
  • Only records in 720p
  • Lags under heavy multitasking

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic Eluga Icon with Lenovo Vibe P1m. When you see Panasonic Eluga Icon Vs Lenovo Vibe P1m comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic Eluga Icon stands against Lenovo Vibe P1m and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Lenovo Vibe P1m is Rs. 17,000. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page