Compare Panasonic Eluga L 4G vs LYF Wind 3

Feature Comparison

  • The LYF Wind 3 has 5.5 inch Screen Size, which is 9.0% more
  • LYF Wind 3 has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of LYF Wind 3's is 50.0% more than Panasonic Eluga L 4G
 
Panasonic Eluga L 4G
LYF Wind 3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
87 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
66 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 233 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode Touch Focus, Auto Focus, Face Detection, Manual HDR, Panorama, FHD Recording (1080p), 30 Frames per Second   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
FitHome UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142 x 71 x 6.1 152.6 x 76.6 x 9.4   
Weight
110 grams 159.2 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Radiant Blue Black   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2920mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Panasonic Eluga L 4G vs LYF Wind 3 Specs

Specs
Panasonic Eluga L 4GLYF Wind 3  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2920mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic Eluga L 4G with LYF Wind 3. When you see Panasonic Eluga L 4G Vs LYF Wind 3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic Eluga L 4G stands against LYF Wind 3 and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic Eluga L 4G is currently Rs. 7,399. The lowest price for LYF Wind 3 is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page