Compare Panasonic Eluga Turbo vs LYF Wind 4S

Feature Comparison

  • Both Panasonic Eluga Turbo and LYF Wind 4S have same Screen Size
  • The Panasonic Eluga Turbo's Internal Storage measures in at 32GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • Panasonic Eluga Turbo's got 33.0% more RAM
 
Panasonic Eluga Turbo
LYF Wind 4S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
51 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
66 Value For Money Score
58 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.72 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.1GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP3 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop -   
OS Detail
FitHome UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.2 x 71.2 x 6.95 147 X 70 X 55   
Weight
145 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Marine Blue, Champagne Gold, Rose Gold White, Black, Brown, Blue   
Build Material
Glass Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
1 year on mobile and 6 month on accessories 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
25.13GB 11.56GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2350mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) -   
Removable Battery
No -   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Panasonic Eluga Turbo vs LYF Wind 4S Specs

Specs
Panasonic Eluga TurboLYF Wind 4S  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2350mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic Eluga Turbo with LYF Wind 4S. When you see Panasonic Eluga Turbo Vs LYF Wind 4S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic Eluga Turbo stands against LYF Wind 4S and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic Eluga Turbo is currently Rs. 9,299. The lowest price for LYF Wind 4S is Rs. 6,250. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page