Compare Panasonic Eluga Z vs LYF Water 4

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Panasonic Eluga Z is the same as LYF Water 4
  • Both Panasonic Eluga Z and LYF Water 4 have same Internal Storage
  • Both Panasonic Eluga Z and LYF Water 4 have same RAM
 
Panasonic Eluga Z
LYF Water 4
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
87 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
64 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592M Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Face Detection, Geo Tagging, High Dynamic Range Mode (HDR), Touch To Focus Touch Focus, Face Detection, Manual HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, IR Blaster -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
141.3 x 70.6 x 6.8 142 x 70 x 7.7   
Weight
120 grams 138.5 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, White, Blue White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2050mAh 2920mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Panasonic Eluga Z vs LYF Water 4 Specs

Specs
Panasonic Eluga ZLYF Water 4  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2050mAh2920mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

LYF Water 4 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display at 294PPI
  • Good rear camera in good lighting conditions
  • Decent overall performance
  • Battery life holds up well
The Bad
  • Runs on dated Android 5.1 Lollipop
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • Misses out on storage expansion

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic Eluga Z with LYF Water 4. When you see Panasonic Eluga Z Vs LYF Water 4 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic Eluga Z stands against LYF Water 4 and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic Eluga Z is currently Rs. 5,399. The lowest price for LYF Water 4 is Rs. 6,099. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page