Compare Panasonic P55 Max vs Intex Aqua Lions 3

Feature Comparison

  • Panasonic P55 Max's got 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Panasonic P55 Max is the same as Intex Aqua Lions 3
  • The 3GB RAM on the Panasonic P55 Max is 33.0% more
 
Panasonic P55 Max
Intex Aqua Lions 3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
58 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Asahi Dragontrail Glass -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.25GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6737 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Expposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, HDR, Beautification Mode, Panaroma   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Quad-LED True Tone Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, IR Blaster -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
152 x 77.6 x 8.7 146.5 x 72.2 x 10.1   
Weight
180 grams 167.5 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Matte Black, Champagne Gold Black   
Build Material
Metal, Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on product and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
1.36W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.637W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Screen Guard -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
5000mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes -   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Panasonic P55 Max vs Intex Aqua Lions 3 Specs

Specs
Panasonic P55 MaxIntex Aqua Lions 3  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 5000mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic P55 Max with Intex Aqua Lions 3. When you see Panasonic P55 Max Vs Intex Aqua Lions 3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic P55 Max stands against Intex Aqua Lions 3 and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic P55 Max is currently Rs. 7,499. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Lions 3 is Rs. 5,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 10, 2017.
Report an error on this page