Compare Panasonic P71 vs Yu Yunique 2

Feature Comparison

  • Both Panasonic P71 and Yu Yunique 2 have same Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Panasonic P71 is the same as Yu Yunique 2
  • The 2GB RAM on the Yu Yunique 2 is 50.0% more
 
Panasonic P71
Yu Yunique 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
62 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
66 Value For Money Score
91 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.72 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.25GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6737 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Continuous shooting, HDR,Digital zoom, Panorama, Geotagging, Scene mode, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection, Exposure compensation, White balance setting, ISO settings Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143 × 71 × 8.15 145x 72.7 x 9.15   
Weight
138 grams 195 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray Black, Gold Champagne, Coal Black   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 year phone and 6 months box accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
LTE 850 / 1800 / 2300 MHz LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Panasonic P71 vs Yu Yunique 2 Specs

Specs
Panasonic P71Yu Yunique 2  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic P71 with Yu Yunique 2. When you see Panasonic P71 Vs Yu Yunique 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic P71 stands against Yu Yunique 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic P71 is currently Rs. 6,600. The lowest price for Yu Yunique 2 is Rs. 5,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page