Compare Panasonic P81 vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Panasonic P81 has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Intex Aqua Ace 4G's is 50.0% more than Panasonic P81
  • The Intex Aqua Ace 4G has 3GB RAM, which is 66.0% more
 
Panasonic P81
Intex Aqua Ace 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
48 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
F2.2 Fit Aperture Coupled with 28 mm Wide Angle Lens, Wide Angle Shots, Digital zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch focus Add Face Detection, Gesture Capture, Take Photo While Recording, Voice Capture,Panorama, Mira Vision   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
152.1 x 76.2 x 7.9 145 x 71.5 x 6.7   
Weight
145 grams 122 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual, Warranty Card, Cover, Screen Guard -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.01GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Panasonic P81 vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G Specs

Specs
Panasonic P81Intex Aqua Ace 4G  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Intex Aqua Ace 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Ample 3GB of RAM for excellent multitasking experience
  • Support 4G LTE network in India
The Bad
  • Average battery life
  • Not that great processor performance
  • Android Lollipop is a slight disappointment in Marshmallow era

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic P81 with Intex Aqua Ace 4G. When you see Panasonic P81 Vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic P81 stands against Intex Aqua Ace 4G and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Ace 4G is Rs. 9,899. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page