Compare Panasonic P88 vs Intex Aqua Crystal

Feature Comparison

  • Panasonic P88's got 5.0% more Screen Size
  • Panasonic P88's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • The 2GB RAM on the Panasonic P88 is 50.0% more
 
Panasonic P88
Intex Aqua Crystal
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
41 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
84 Value For Money Score
53 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.3 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
277 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Asahi Dragontrail Glass -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
2.5D Curved Glass -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6737M MediaTek MT6737V   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP -   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Triple LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
146 x 73.25 x 8.35 140 × 71.2 × 7.4   
Weight
156 grams 140 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Charcoal Grey Black, White   
Build Material
Metal -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month for Accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300) MHz -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Panasonic P88 vs Intex Aqua Crystal Specs

Specs
Panasonic P88Intex Aqua Crystal  
Screen Size 5.3 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Intex Aqua Crystal Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent display
  • Good looking glass plastic sandwich body
The Bad
  • Unresponsive touchscreen
  • Tons of bloatware
  • Slippery glass body
  • Poor performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic P88 with Intex Aqua Crystal. When you see Panasonic P88 Vs Intex Aqua Crystal comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic P88 stands against Intex Aqua Crystal and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic P88 is currently Rs. 6,090. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Crystal is Rs. 8,195. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page