Compare Panasonic T50 vs Intex Aqua 4.0 4G

Feature Comparison

  • The Panasonic T50's got 4.5 inch Screen Size, while Intex Aqua 4.0 4G's Screen Size is 4 inch
  • Panasonic T50's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • Panasonic T50's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Panasonic T50
Intex Aqua 4.0 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
84 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
63 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 4 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 640 x 360 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
218 PPI 186 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6580M Spreadtrum SC9832A   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 512MB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Continuous shooting, Face detection, Geo-tagging, Digital zoom, ISO settings, Touch focus, Panorama, Face detection, HDR, Touch focus, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode Face Detection, Slow Motion Picture Effect, Panaroma Effect   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Sail UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
131.70 x 66.30 x 8.80 124.7 x 61.6 x 10.4   
Weight
124 grams 112 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Rose Gold, Champagne Gold, Midnight Blue Black, Blue, Champagne Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories Brand Warranty of 1 Year Available for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- 1.012W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.514W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.83GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz B2/3/5/8   
3G Bands
UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz B1/8   
4G Bands
- B1/3/5   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1600mAh 1500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Panasonic T50 vs Intex Aqua 4.0 4G Specs

Specs
Panasonic T50Intex Aqua 4.0 4G  
Screen Size 4.5 inch4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  
RAM 1GB512MB  
Battery Capacity 1600mAh1500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP0.3MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic T50 with Intex Aqua 4.0 4G. When you see Panasonic T50 Vs Intex Aqua 4.0 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic T50 stands against Intex Aqua 4.0 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic T50 is currently Rs. 5,134. The lowest price for Intex Aqua 4.0 4G is Rs. 3,245. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page