Compare Samsung Galaxy A5 vs LG F60 D392

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy A5 has 5 inch Screen Size and LG F60 D392 has 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • Samsung Galaxy A5's got 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Samsung Galaxy A5 has 50.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy A5
LG F60 D392
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
28 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
75 Value For Money Score
52 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
Super AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 207.3 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm -   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 -   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama BSI Camera   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- Android (4.4)   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
139.3 x 69.7 x 6.7 127.5 x 67.9 x 10.6   
Weight
123 grams 130 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Midnight Black, Pearl White, Champagne Gold, Blue -   
Build Material
Glass, Metal -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.48W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.65W/kg -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.58GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - A500F, A500FQ, A500FU, A500HQ, A500YZ, A500M, A500Y -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) - A500F, A500FQ, A500FU -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy A5 vs LG F60 D392 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy A5LG F60 D392  
Screen Size 5 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP0.3MP  

Samsung Galaxy A5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Display has Gorilla Glass 4 protection
  • Brushed Aluminium finish on the sides ensures that phone is not slippery
  • Multi window option available for greater productivity
The Bad
  • Camera struggles in anything less than perfectly lit conditions
  • Metallic back is prone to pick up scratches
  • TouchWiz is not best optimized and does lag in the day to day tasks

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy A5 with LG F60 D392. When you see Samsung Galaxy A5 Vs LG F60 D392 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy A5 stands against LG F60 D392 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy A5 is currently Rs. 19,900. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page