Compare Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 vs Videocon Challenger V40CF1

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 is the same as Videocon Challenger V40CF1
  • Videocon Challenger V40CF1's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 and Videocon Challenger V40CF1 have same RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
Videocon Challenger V40CF1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 / 100
80 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79Value For Money
62Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 4 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 233 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Broadcom Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Broadcom 21663 Spreadtrum SC7731   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Broadcom Videocore IV Mali-400   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Face & Smile Detection Autofocus, Self timer, Face Detection, Scene Modes, Smile Shutter   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.2 x 62.7 x 9.8 124 x 64.5 x 9   
Weight
115 grams 132 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.45W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.67W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
OTG Support
No No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 1800 / 900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 - S7270, S7272 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - S7275 UMTS 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 1350mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 vs Videocon Challenger V40CF1 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3Videocon Challenger V40CF1  
Screen Size 4 inch4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh1350mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP0.3MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 with Videocon Challenger V40CF1. When you see Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 Vs Videocon Challenger V40CF1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 stands against Videocon Challenger V40CF1 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Videocon Challenger V40CF1 is Rs. 3,999. The prices for both these products were updated January 23, 2018.

Get Rs. 5 for every unique specification mistake (or missing specs) that you point out via this form. Amount would be paid via Paytm. Enter your Paytm mobile number in the description box.

Report an error on this page