Compare Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H vs LYF Wind 6

Feature Comparison

  • The 5 inch Screen Size on the LYF Wind 6 is 20.0% more
  • The LYF Wind 6's got 8GB Internal Storage, while Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H's Internal Storage is 4GB
  • LYF Wind 6 has 1GB RAM, whereas Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H has 512MB RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H
LYF Wind 6
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
36 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
64 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 196 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.1GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 210   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Adreno 304   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.1MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging -   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.4 x 62.9 x 10.7 143.50 x 72.00 x 8.70   
Weight
123 grams 156 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Ceramic White, Black Black, White, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Body SAR
0.68W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.68W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.02GB 4.1GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
- Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 2250mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H vs LYF Wind 6 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313HLYF Wind 6  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.1MP5MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh2250mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

LYF Wind 6 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent Performance for the price
  • Stock Android UI, no bloatware pre-installed
The Bad
  • Touchscreen experience is below average. Two finger support only
  • 1GB of RAM and 8GB of Internal Storage is not adequate for daily use
  • Battery takes over 2 hours to charge
  • 4G Available on both SIM slots but only 1 SIM can access 4G network at a time.

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H with LYF Wind 6. When you see Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H Vs LYF Wind 6 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H stands against LYF Wind 6 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H is currently Rs. 5,499. The lowest price for LYF Wind 6 is Rs. 5,599. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page