Compare Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H vs Panasonic P65 Flash

Feature Comparison

  • Panasonic P65 Flash's 5.5 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H's 4 inch Screen Size
  • The Panasonic P65 Flash's got 8GB Internal Storage, while Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H's Internal Storage is 4GB
  • The 1GB RAM on the Panasonic P65 Flash is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H
Panasonic P65 Flash
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
54 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
52 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum -   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- -   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.1MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- Android (5.1)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.4 x 62.9 x 10.7 151 x 77.8 x 8.95   
Weight
123 grams 168 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Ceramic White, Black Silver   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
0.68W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.68W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.02GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
- Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 2910mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H vs Panasonic P65 Flash Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313HPanasonic P65 Flash  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.1MP8MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh2910mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H with Panasonic P65 Flash. When you see Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H Vs Panasonic P65 Flash comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H stands against Panasonic P65 Flash and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Ace NXT SM-G313H is currently Rs. 5,499. The lowest price for Panasonic P65 Flash is Rs. 6,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 19, 2017.
Report an error on this page