Compare Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus vs Lenovo Vibe P1

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Vibe P1's Screen Size is 33.0% more
  • The Internal Storage on Lenovo Vibe P1 is 90.0% more
  • RAM of Lenovo Vibe P1's is 75.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus
 
Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus
Lenovo Vibe P1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
10 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
46 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.65 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 320 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
158 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Single-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 200 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
LED Flash, Geo-Tagging, Face And Smile Detection. Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 2.3 Gingerbread Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
TouchWiz UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
114.5 x 62.5 x 11.2 152.9 x 75.6 x 9.9   
Weight
115 grams 187 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Dark Blue Silver, Grey   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.6W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.49W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
3GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 23.77GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1300mAh 4900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus vs Lenovo Vibe P1 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Ace PlusLenovo Vibe P1  
Screen Size 3.65 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1300mAh4900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Lenovo Vibe P1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Amazing battery life, huge 4900mAh battery
  • Good display with Gorilla Glass Protection
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Dual 4G SIM Support
The Bad
  • Outdoor legibility is poor
  • Heavy to hold
  • Camera performance is hit or miss

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus with Lenovo Vibe P1. When you see Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus Vs Lenovo Vibe P1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus stands against Lenovo Vibe P1 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus is currently Rs. 8,500. The lowest price for Lenovo Vibe P1 is Rs. 15,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page