Compare Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus vs Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos I9082

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos I9082's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus's 3.65 inch Screen Size
  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos I9082's got 62.0% more Internal Storage
  • The Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos I9082 has 1GB RAM, which is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus
Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos I9082
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
30 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
46 Value For Money Score
65 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.65 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 320 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
158 PPI 186.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Broadcom   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
- Broadcom 28155   
Processor Type
Single-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 200 Broadcom Videocore IV   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
LED Flash, Geo-Tagging, Face And Smile Detection. Autofocus, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, Image Stabilization   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 2.3 Gingerbread Android 4.1 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
TouchWiz UI TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 4.2   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
114.5 x 62.5 x 11.2 143.5 x 76.9 x 9.6   
Weight
115 grams 162 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Dark Blue White, Black, Blue   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
0.6W/kg 1.11W/kg   
Head SAR
0.49W/kg 0.37W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
3GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 4.04GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
No No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1300mAh 2100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus vs Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos I9082 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Ace PlusSamsung Galaxy Grand Duos I9082  
Screen Size 3.65 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1300mAh2100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus with Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos I9082. When you see Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus Vs Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos I9082 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus stands against Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos I9082 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus is currently Rs. 8,500. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page