Compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Lenovo Phab Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Lenovo Phab Plus's is 33.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Core 2
  • Lenovo Phab Plus has 32GB Internal Storage, whereas Samsung Galaxy Core 2 has 4GB Internal Storage
  • Lenovo Phab Plus's got 62.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Core 2
Lenovo Phab Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
29 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 6.8 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
207 PPI 326 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
768MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
130.3 x 68 x 9.8 186.6 x 96.6 x 7.6   
Weight
138 grams 229 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Gunmetal Grey   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
6 Months Accessories Warranty -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 3500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Lenovo Phab Plus Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Core 2Lenovo Phab Plus  
Screen Size 4.5 inch6.8 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 768MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh3500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compact design
  • 3G connectivity
  • Dedicated Dual SIM slot and Micro SD expansion slot
The Bad
  • Poor battery life
  • Complains of poor touch calibration
  • Slow and sluggish performance

Lenovo Phab Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Fine finish & build
  • Near Stock Android interface
The Bad
  • Unsatisfactory camera output
  • Huge footprint due to the 6.8-inch display

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 with Lenovo Phab Plus. When you see Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Vs Lenovo Phab Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Core 2 stands against Lenovo Phab Plus and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Lenovo Phab Plus is Rs. 14,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page