Compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Micromax Canvas 2 (2017)

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas 2 (2017) has 10.0% more Screen Size
  • Micromax Canvas 2 (2017) has 16GB Internal Storage and Samsung Galaxy Core 2 has 4GB Internal Storage
  • Micromax Canvas 2 (2017)'s got 75.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Core 2
Micromax Canvas 2 (2017)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
28 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
207 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 5   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
768MB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection -   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
130.3 x 68 x 9.8 144.2 x 70.8 x 8.5   
Weight
138 grams 160 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Chrome   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
6 Months Accessories Warranty -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 3050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Micromax Canvas 2 (2017) Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Core 2Micromax Canvas 2 (2017)  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 768MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh3050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compact design
  • 3G connectivity
  • Dedicated Dual SIM slot and Micro SD expansion slot
The Bad
  • Poor battery life
  • Complains of poor touch calibration
  • Slow and sluggish performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 with Micromax Canvas 2 (2017). When you see Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Vs Micromax Canvas 2 (2017) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Core 2 stands against Micromax Canvas 2 (2017) and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas 2 (2017) is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page