Compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Panasonic Eluga Z

Feature Comparison

  • Panasonic Eluga Z's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy Core 2's 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Panasonic Eluga Z is 75.0% more
  • Panasonic Eluga Z's RAM is 62.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Core 2
Panasonic Eluga Z
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
46 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
64 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
207 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6592M   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
768MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection Face Detection, Geo Tagging, High Dynamic Range Mode (HDR), Touch To Focus   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, IR Blaster   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
130.3 x 68 x 9.8 141.3 x 70.6 x 6.8   
Weight
138 grams 120 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Gold, White, Blue   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
6 Months Accessories Warranty 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Panasonic Eluga Z Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Core 2Panasonic Eluga Z  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 768MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compact design
  • 3G connectivity
  • Dedicated Dual SIM slot and Micro SD expansion slot
The Bad
  • Poor battery life
  • Complains of poor touch calibration
  • Slow and sluggish performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 with Panasonic Eluga Z. When you see Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Vs Panasonic Eluga Z comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Core 2 stands against Panasonic Eluga Z and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga Z is Rs. 5,400. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page