Compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Yu Yureka Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Yu Yureka Plus has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Samsung Galaxy Core 2 has 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • Yu Yureka Plus's got 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of Yu Yureka Plus's is 62.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Core 2
 
Samsung Galaxy Core 2
Yu Yureka Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
72 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
207 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
768MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
130.3 x 68 x 9.8 154.8 x 78 x 8.5   
Weight
138 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White, Moondust Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
6 Months Accessories Warranty -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB 13GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Yu Yureka Plus Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Core 2Yu Yureka Plus  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 768MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compact design
  • 3G connectivity
  • Dedicated Dual SIM slot and Micro SD expansion slot
The Bad
  • Poor battery life
  • Complains of poor touch calibration
  • Slow and sluggish performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 with Yu Yureka Plus. When you see Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Vs Yu Yureka Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Core 2 stands against Yu Yureka Plus and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Yu Yureka Plus is Rs. 6,900. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page