Compare Samsung Galaxy Core vs Vivo Y69

Feature Comparison

  • Vivo Y69's got 21.0% more Screen Size
  • Vivo Y69 has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • The Vivo Y69's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 66.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Core
Vivo Y69
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
27 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.3 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 203 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 16MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, 480p Video Recording Continuous shooting, Touch focus, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Face detection, self timer, Geotagging, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Panorama, ISO settings, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 7.1 Nougat   
OS Detail
- Funtouch 3.2   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
129.3 x 67.6 x 9 154.6 x 75.7 x 7.7   
Weight
124 grams 163 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Metallic Blue, White Champagne Gold, Matte Black   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
- 1.31W/kg   
Head SAR
- 1.21W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.5GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 256GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900, CDMA 800   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300), 41(2500)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Core vs Vivo Y69 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy CoreVivo Y69  
Screen Size 4.3 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP16MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Core with Vivo Y69. When you see Samsung Galaxy Core Vs Vivo Y69 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Core stands against Vivo Y69 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo Y69 is Rs. 12,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 13, 2017.
Report an error on this page