Compare Samsung Galaxy E5 vs LG K10

Feature Comparison

  • LG K10's got 5.0% more Screen Size
  • Both Samsung Galaxy E5 and LG K10 have same Internal Storage
  • LG K10 has 25.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy E5
LG K10
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
95 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
59 Value For Money Score
58 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.3 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
Super AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 277 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
141.6 x 70.2 x 7.3 144.70 x 73.60 x 8.70   
Weight
120 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White, Brown White, Indigo, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.87W/kg -   
Head SAR
1W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 9.72GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2400mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy E5 vs LG K10 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy E5LG K10  
Screen Size 5 inch5.3 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2400mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy E5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED and well calibrated display
  • Decent battery life that should last through the day
The Bad
  • Mediocre performance
  • Quite an outdated Android version

LG K10 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The phone provides adequate grip, so there is no fear of it slipping away
  • Interesting software tweaks added by LG
  • Very good battery life
  • Outdoor legibility is good
The Bad
  • Lacks USB OTG support
  • Modern features like Full HD display and fingerprint scanner are missing
  • Camera shots lack details

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy E5 with LG K10. When you see Samsung Galaxy E5 Vs LG K10 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy E5 stands against LG K10 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy E5 is currently Rs. 15,480. The lowest price for LG K10 is Rs. 8,880. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page