Compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Max vs Lenovo Vibe X2-AP

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Max has 5.25 inch Screen Size, whereas Lenovo Vibe X2-AP has 5 inch Screen Size
  • The Lenovo Vibe X2-AP's Internal Storage measures in at 32GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • The RAM on Lenovo Vibe X2-AP is 25.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Grand Max
Lenovo Vibe X2-AP
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
67 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
65 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.25 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
282 PPI 440.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6595   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama Digital Zoom   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
146.15 x 75 x 7.95 140 x 68.6 x 7.2   
Weight
161 grams 120 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Grey Red, White, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.3W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.49W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12GB -   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB -   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy Grand Max vs Lenovo Vibe X2-AP Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Grand MaxLenovo Vibe X2-AP  
Screen Size 5.25 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Lenovo Vibe X2-AP Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Stunning design with excellent build quality
  • Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Decent performance with 2GB of RAM
The Bad
  • Not that great battery life
  • Average rear camera performance
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Max with Lenovo Vibe X2-AP. When you see Samsung Galaxy Grand Max Vs Lenovo Vibe X2-AP comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Grand Max stands against Lenovo Vibe X2-AP and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Lenovo Vibe X2-AP is Rs. 15,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page