Compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i vs Intex Elyt-E1

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i is 0.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Intex Elyt-E1's is 50.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i
  • Intex Elyt-E1 has 2GB RAM and Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i has 1GB RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i
Intex Elyt-E1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
45 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.01 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
186 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC8830 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode, Touch focus, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.4 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143.7 x 77.1 x 9.5 142.4 x 71.5 x 8.7   
Weight
163 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black, Gold, Lime Green, Orange Champagne   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.32W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.21W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.33GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i vs Intex Elyt-E1 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060iIntex Elyt-E1  
Screen Size 5.01 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i with Intex Elyt-E1. When you see Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i Vs Intex Elyt-E1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i stands against Intex Elyt-E1 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i is currently Rs. 10,999. The lowest price for Intex Elyt-E1 is Rs. 6,799. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page