Compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i vs Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i has 20.0% more Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i is 50.0% more
  • The Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i has 1GB RAM, which is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i
Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
74 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
56 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.01 inch 4 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
186 PPI 233 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum -   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC8830 -   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
1GB 512MB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- Anti-fog, Continuous Shot, Night, Panorama, Sports   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.4 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143.7 x 77.1 x 9.5 121.4 x 62.9 x 10.8   
Weight
163 grams 124 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black, Gold, Lime Green, Orange Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
0.32W/kg 1.07W/kg   
Head SAR
0.21W/kg 1.07W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.33GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
OTG Support
No No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 1500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i vs Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060iSamsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH  
Screen Size 5.01 inch4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  
RAM 1GB512MB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh1500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP0.3MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i with Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH. When you see Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i Vs Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i stands against Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo Plus GT-I9060i is currently Rs. 10,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 9, 2017.
Report an error on this page