Compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060 vs InFocus M680

Feature Comparison

  • InFocus M680's Screen Size is 9.0% more
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the InFocus M680 is 50.0% more
  • The InFocus M680 has 2GB RAM, which is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060
InFocus M680
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
67 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
59 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
186 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Broadcom MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Broadcom 23550 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 13MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean -   
OS Detail
- Android (5.1)   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.4 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143.7 x 77.1 x 9.6 156 x 76.8 x 7.25   
Weight
163 grams -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold, Silver   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.32W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.21W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
6.72GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060 vs InFocus M680 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060InFocus M680  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP13MP  

InFocus M680 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good looking device even if the design is not the most original
  • Solid construction and feels very secure
  • Useful tweaks in the UI
  • Daylight shots from the camera are good
  • Call quality is really impressive
The Bad
  • The paint on the gold colour unit chips off with regular usage
  • Accessories seem to be made out of really cheap materials
  • Display legibility in direct sunlight is poor
  • Capacitive touch buttons have poor accuracy
  • Push the phone too hard and you will find the phone can get a fair bit warm

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060 with InFocus M680. When you see Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060 Vs InFocus M680 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo GT-I9060 stands against InFocus M680 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for InFocus M680 is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page