Compare Samsung Galaxy J1 4G vs Panasonic P85

Feature Comparison

  • Panasonic P85's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy J1 4G's 4.3 inch Screen Size
  • Panasonic P85's got 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • The Panasonic P85's got 2GB RAM, while Samsung Galaxy J1 4G's RAM is 768MB
 
Samsung Galaxy J1 4G
Panasonic P85
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
69 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
63 Value For Money Score
63 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.3 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6735P   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
768MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Expposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
129 x 68.2 x 8.9 145 x 72.2 x 9.35   
Weight
122 grams 146.7 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gold, White Gold, Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.8GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 64GB   
OTG Support
No No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1850mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy J1 4G vs Panasonic P85 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy J1 4GPanasonic P85  
Screen Size 4.3 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 768MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1850mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy J1 4G with Panasonic P85. When you see Samsung Galaxy J1 4G Vs Panasonic P85 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy J1 4G stands against Panasonic P85 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Panasonic P85 is Rs. 5,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page