Compare Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro vs Lenovo A7700

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo A7700 has 5.5 inch Screen Size, whereas Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro has 5 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro is the same as Lenovo A7700
  • Both Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro and Lenovo A7700 have same RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro
Lenovo A7700
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
73 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79 Value For Money Score
62 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
Super AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC9830 MediaTek MT6735P   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- Vibe UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.2 x 71.3 x 8 152 x 76.2 x 8.5   
Weight
139 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray, Gold, White, Black Matte Black, White   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.37W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.43W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 41(2500) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) -   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro vs Lenovo A7700 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy J3 ProLenovo A7700  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good Super AMOLED display
  • Comes with NFC
  • Has separate slot for microSD card
  • Supports USB OTG
  • Decent build quality and design
The Bad
  • Camera quality is pretty average
  • Speaker output is not up to the mark
  • Battery backup is less
  • Lacks compass sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro with Lenovo A7700. When you see Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro Vs Lenovo A7700 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro stands against Lenovo A7700 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro is currently Rs. 6,990. The lowest price for Lenovo A7700 is Rs. 7,690. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page