Compare Samsung Galaxy J3 vs Intex Aqua Fish

Feature Comparison

  • Both Samsung Galaxy J3 and Intex Aqua Fish have same Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Intex Aqua Fish's is 50.0% more than Samsung Galaxy J3
  • Intex Aqua Fish's got 25.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy J3
Intex Aqua Fish
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
50 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
74 Value For Money Score
56 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
Super AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Asahi Dragontrail Glass -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC9830 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 Adreno 304   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Sailfish OS 2.0   
OS Detail
Samsung Experience -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.3 x 71 x 7.9 142.4 x 72 x 9.6   
Weight
138 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gold, White Orange   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
6 Month Accessories Warranty -   
Body SAR
1.12W/kg -   
Head SAR
1.17W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.4GB 9.6GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy J3 vs Intex Aqua Fish Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy J3Intex Aqua Fish  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1.5GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Samsung Galaxy J3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Thanks to an AMOLED panel, the colors are crisp and punchy with good contrasts
  • An inbuilt S-Bike mode allows for safe bike riding
The Bad
  • No Gorilla Glass protection
  • Launched with an older Android version (Android Lollipop) with no information on updates
  • Lack of basic sensors such as Ambient Light Sensor or Magnetometer
  • A rather new and unknown processor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy J3 with Intex Aqua Fish. When you see Samsung Galaxy J3 Vs Intex Aqua Fish comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy J3 stands against Intex Aqua Fish and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page