Compare Samsung Galaxy J5 vs HTC Desire 628

Feature Comparison

  • Both Samsung Galaxy J5 and HTC Desire 628 have same Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on HTC Desire 628 is 75.0% more
  • The HTC Desire 628's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy J5
HTC Desire 628
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
98 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
64 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
Super AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Mali-720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.1 x 71.8 x 7.9 146.9 x 70.9 x 8.19   
Weight
146 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Black, White Blue, White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
1.13W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.8W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.2GB 25GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 2TB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes -   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy J5 vs HTC Desire 628 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy J5HTC Desire 628  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy J5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent Performance
  • AMOLED Display offers good contrast
  • Dual SIM with 4G connectivity
The Bad
  • Low, 8GB of Internal Storage
  • Lacks Ambient Light Sensor and Magnetometer
  • 1.5GB of RAM isn't adequate

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy J5 with HTC Desire 628. When you see Samsung Galaxy J5 Vs HTC Desire 628 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy J5 stands against HTC Desire 628 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy J5 is currently Rs. 10,490. The lowest price for HTC Desire 628 is Rs. 10,990. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page