Compare Samsung Galaxy J5 vs InFocus M370 i

Feature Comparison

  • Both Samsung Galaxy J5 and InFocus M370 i have same Screen Size
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the InFocus M370 i is 50.0% more
  • The RAM on InFocus M370 i is 25.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy J5
InFocus M370 i
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
73 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
65 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
Super AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.1GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Adreno 304   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection Geotagging, Autofocus, FHD Recording (1080p), 30 Frames per second   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.1 x 71.8 x 7.9 143 x 71.5 x 8.1   
Weight
146 grams 125 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Black, White White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
1.13W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.8W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 64GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2230mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy J5 vs InFocus M370 i Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy J5InFocus M370 i  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 1.5GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2230mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Samsung Galaxy J5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent Performance
  • AMOLED Display offers good contrast
  • Dual SIM with 4G connectivity
The Bad
  • Low, 8GB of Internal Storage
  • Lacks Ambient Light Sensor and Magnetometer
  • 1.5GB of RAM isn't adequate

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy J5 with InFocus M370 i. When you see Samsung Galaxy J5 Vs InFocus M370 i comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy J5 stands against InFocus M370 i and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy J5 is currently Rs. 10,290. The lowest price for InFocus M370 i is Rs. 5,599. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page