Compare Samsung Galaxy On5 vs Zen Cinemax Click

Feature Comparison

  • Zen Cinemax Click has 5.5 inch Screen Size, whereas Samsung Galaxy On5 has 5 inch Screen Size
  • Both Samsung Galaxy On5 and Zen Cinemax Click have same Internal Storage
  • The Samsung Galaxy On5 has 1.5GB RAM, which is 33.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy On5
Zen Cinemax Click
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
88 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
77 Value For Money Score
63 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Samsung Exynos -   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Exynos 3475 -   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP1 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
142.3 x 72.1 x 8.5 -   
Weight
149 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gold Gold   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
Brand Warranty of 1 Year Available for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
1.09W/kg -   
Head SAR
1.4W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900), 20(800), 40(2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) -   
Removable Battery
Yes -   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy On5 vs Zen Cinemax Click Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy On5Zen Cinemax Click  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1.5GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy On5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good display with adequate sharpness & brightness
  • Comfortable to hold
  • Acceptable battery life
The Bad
  • Inadequate RAM & internal storage
  • Laggy upon heavy usage
  • Rear camera performance not satisfactory
  • Average build quality
  • No ambient light sensor (auto-brightness)

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy On5 with Zen Cinemax Click. When you see Samsung Galaxy On5 Vs Zen Cinemax Click comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy On5 stands against Zen Cinemax Click and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy On5 is currently Rs. 6,900. The lowest price for Zen Cinemax Click is Rs. 5,700. The prices for both these products were updated December 19, 2017.
Report an error on this page