Compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 vs Motorola Moto X

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 is the same as Motorola Moto X
  • Motorola Moto X's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Motorola Moto X has 50.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552
Motorola Moto X
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
50 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
59 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
199 PPI 312 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 203 Adreno 320   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 10MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Autofocus, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection 1.4 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 4.2 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.1   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Barometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
133.3 x 70.7 x 9.7 129.3 x 65.3 x 10.4   
Weight
143 grams 130 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Titan Grey, White Black, Red, Blue, Walnut, Teak, Turquoise, White   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.67W/kg 0.5W/kg   
Head SAR
0.26W/kg 1.39W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.72GB -   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 7(2600), 20(800)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 vs Motorola Moto X Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552Motorola Moto X  
Screen Size 4.7 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP10MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 with Motorola Moto X. When you see Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 Vs Motorola Moto X comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 stands against Motorola Moto X and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 is currently Rs. 12,000. The lowest price for Motorola Moto X is Rs. 15,622. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page