Compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 vs Oppo R1 R829T

Feature Comparison

  • Oppo R1 R829T's Screen Size is 5.0% more
  • The Internal Storage on Oppo R1 R829T is 50.0% more
  • Both Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 and Oppo R1 R829T have same RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552
Oppo R1 R829T
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
42 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
62 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
199 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MediaTek MT6582   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 203 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Autofocus, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection Geo-tagging, Touch focus, Exposure compensation, Face detection, panorama, HDR, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean -   
OS Detail
- Android (4.2)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
133.3 x 70.7 x 9.7 142.7 x 70.4 x 7.1   
Weight
143 grams 141 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Titan Grey, White White   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
0.67W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.26W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Cover   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.72GB 11GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 UMTS 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2410mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 vs Oppo R1 R829T Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552Oppo R1 R829T  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2410mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 with Oppo R1 R829T. When you see Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 Vs Oppo R1 R829T comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 stands against Oppo R1 R829T and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Grand Quattro I8552 is currently Rs. 12,000. The lowest price for Oppo R1 R829T is Rs. 11,490. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page