Compare Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3 vs HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim's got 5 inch Screen Size, while Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3's Screen Size is 4 inch
  • HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim has 8GB Internal Storage and Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3 has 4GB Internal Storage
  • RAM of HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim's is 50.0% more than Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3
 
Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3
HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
60 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
59 Value For Money Score
60 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Broadcom MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Broadcom 21663 MediaTek MT6592   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- ISO settings, Digital zoom, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Face detection, White balance setting, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.4 x 62.9 x 10.8 150.1 x 72.7 x 9.6   
Weight
124 grams 160 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Charcoal Gray, White Black, Santorini White, Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.8GB 4.06GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 2100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3 vs HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh2100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3 with HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim. When you see Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3 Vs HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3 stands against HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3 is currently Rs. 6,499. The lowest price for HTC Desire 620G Dual Sim is Rs. 6,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page