Compare Samsung Galaxy S Plus I9001 vs HTC Butterfly X920D

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Butterfly X920D's Screen Size measures in at 5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 20.0% more
  • HTC Butterfly X920D's 16GB Internal Storage is more than Samsung Galaxy S Plus I9001's 8MB Internal Storage
  • HTC Butterfly X920D's got 75.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy S Plus I9001
HTC Butterfly X920D
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
66 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52Value For Money
54Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
Super AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 440.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 2   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 205 Adreno 320   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 2.1MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Continuous shooting, HDR, Exposure compensation, Geotagging, Face & Smile Detection, Digita zoom, Panorama, White balance setting, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 2.3 Gingerbread Android 4.1 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
TouchWiz 3.0 UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 4.2   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
122.4 x 64.2 x 9.9 143 x 70.5 x 9.1   
Weight
119 grams 140 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- -   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
0.94W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.44W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8MB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1650mAh 2020mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy S Plus I9001 vs HTC Butterfly X920D Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy S Plus I9001HTC Butterfly X920D  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1650mAh2020mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP2.1MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy S Plus I9001 with HTC Butterfly X920D. When you see Samsung Galaxy S Plus I9001 Vs HTC Butterfly X920D comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy S Plus I9001 stands against HTC Butterfly X920D and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated February 26, 2018.
Report an error on this page