Compare Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i vs Meizu M3 Note

Feature Comparison

  • Meizu M3 Note's Screen Size is 12.0% more
  • Meizu M3 Note has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • The RAM on Meizu M3 Note is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i
Meizu M3 Note
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
54 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.8 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
Super AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
306 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
1.9MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.3 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.4 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 153.6 x 75.5 x 8.2   
Weight
132 grams 163 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Garnet Red, Pebble Blue, Titaniuma Grey, Sapphire Black, Amber Brown White, Grey, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.9W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.52W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB -   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i vs Meizu M3 Note Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300iMeizu M3 Note  
Screen Size 4.8 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.9MP5MP  

Meizu M3 Note Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good-looking metal construction
  • Good fingerprint sensor
  • Long battery life
The Bad
  • Not a class-leading performance
  • Average camera output

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i with Meizu M3 Note. When you see Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i Vs Meizu M3 Note comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i stands against Meizu M3 Note and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i is currently Rs. 12,689. The lowest price for Meizu M3 Note is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 13, 2017.
Report an error on this page