Compare Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E vs Lenovo A6600 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • The Lenovo A6600 Plus's got 5 inch Screen Size, while Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E's Screen Size is 4.3 inch
  • The Lenovo A6600 Plus has 16GB Internal Storage, which is 75.0% more
  • Lenovo A6600 Plus has 2GB RAM and Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E has 512MB RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E
Lenovo A6600 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
25 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.3 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC7715 MediaTek MT6735P   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- Vibe UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
129.7 x 65.9 x 9.4 141 x 71 x 8.8   
Weight
129 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Matte White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
1.12W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.75W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE 850 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 MHz , TDD 2300 MHz (B40)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E vs Lenovo A6600 Plus Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350ELenovo A6600 Plus  
Screen Size 4.3 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3MP8MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E with Lenovo A6600 Plus. When you see Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E Vs Lenovo A6600 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E stands against Lenovo A6600 Plus and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Lenovo A6600 Plus is Rs. 5,850. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page