Compare Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E vs Micromax Canvas Spark Q380

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Micromax Canvas Spark Q380's is 8.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E
  • The Micromax Canvas Spark Q380 has 8GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • The Micromax Canvas Spark Q380's RAM measures in at 1GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E
Micromax Canvas Spark Q380
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
34 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
60 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.3 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217 PPI 234.4 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC7715 MediaTek MT6582M   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging -   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
129.7 x 65.9 x 9.4 -   
Weight
129 grams 134 grams   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.12W/kg 0.42W/kg   
Head SAR
0.75W/kg 0.29W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB 4.94GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E vs Micromax Canvas Spark Q380 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350EMicromax Canvas Spark Q380  
Screen Size 4.3 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3MP8MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP  

Micromax Canvas Spark Q380 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • MicroSD card expansion up to 32GB
The Bad
  • Mediocre processor
  • Only 1GB of RAM
  • Lacks 4G support
  • Average performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E with Micromax Canvas Spark Q380. When you see Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E Vs Micromax Canvas Spark Q380 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E stands against Micromax Canvas Spark Q380 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Spark Q380 is Rs. 6,790. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page