Compare Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E vs Oppo Joy 3

Feature Comparison

  • The Oppo Joy 3 has 4.5 inch Screen Size, which is 4.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E is the same as Oppo Joy 3
  • RAM of Oppo Joy 3's is 50.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E
 
Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E
Oppo Joy 3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
45 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
53 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.3 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217 PPI 217.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC7715 MediaTek MT6582   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Geo-tagging, Digital zoom, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, HDR, Panorama, Digital image stabilization, HDR, Face detection, ISO settings, Self timer, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- Android (4.4)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
129.7 x 65.9 x 9.4 132.8 x 66.6 x 9   
Weight
129 grams 135 grams   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
1.12W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.75W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB 1.39GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E vs Oppo Joy 3 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350EOppo Joy 3  
Screen Size 4.3 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3MP5MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP  

Oppo Joy 3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Dual SIM device
  • Expandable storage up to 32GB
The Bad
  • Small display that is not very sharp
  • Poor camera performance
  • Average performer with just 1GB RAM
  • Quite an outdated Android version (Android 4.4 KitKat)
  • Lacks 4G support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E with Oppo Joy 3. When you see Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E Vs Oppo Joy 3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E stands against Oppo Joy 3 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page