Compare Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E vs Sony Xperia M2 Aqua

Feature Comparison

  • Sony Xperia M2 Aqua's 4.8 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E's 4.3 inch Screen Size
  • Sony Xperia M2 Aqua has 8GB Internal Storage and Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E has 4GB Internal Storage
  • Sony Xperia M2 Aqua's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
29 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.3 inch 4.8 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217 PPI 229 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC7715 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging Geo-Tagging, Digital zoom, White balance settings, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Digital image stabilization, Panorama, Continuous shooting, ISO settings, Self timer   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.1   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- IP68 (Dust and Water Resistant - 1.5 meters for 30 minutes)   
Dimensions (mm)
129.7 x 65.9 x 9.4 140 x 72 x 8.6   
Weight
129 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black White, Copper, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
1.12W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.75W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) - D2403   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E vs Sony Xperia M2 Aqua Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350ESony Xperia M2 Aqua  
Screen Size 4.3 inch4.8 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3MP8MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E with Sony Xperia M2 Aqua. When you see Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E Vs Sony Xperia M2 Aqua comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E stands against Sony Xperia M2 Aqua and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page