Compare Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 vs Micromax Canvas Amaze Q395

 
Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262
Micromax Canvas Amaze Q395
Add
Intex Aqua Pro 4G
Intex Aqua Pro 4G
Add
Samsung Galaxy Star ...
Samsung Galaxy Star Advance G350E
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
24 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48VFM Score
69VFM Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Notch
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
Touch Screen
- -   
Color
White, Black Black   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6580   
Co-Processor
- -   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 Mali-400 MP2   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Camera
- -   
Rear Camera Resolution
2MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Triple Rear Camera
- -   
Four Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- Auto Flash, Geo tagging, High Dynamic Range Mode (HDR), Touch To Focus   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Slow Motion Video Recording
- -   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
Zoom
- -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean -   
OS Detail
- Android (5.0)   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
121 grams -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.2 x 62.7 x 10.6 -   
Height
- -   
Width
- -   
Thickness
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.69GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
Loudspeaker
- -   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
SIM 1 Bands
- -   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
- -   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   
Standby Time
- -   
Talk Time
- -   
Multimedia     
Music
- -   
Video Player
- -   

Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 vs Micromax Canvas Amaze Q395 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262Micromax Canvas Amaze Q395  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 2MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  
This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 with Micromax Canvas Amaze Q395. When you see Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 Vs Micromax Canvas Amaze Q395 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 stands against Micromax Canvas Amaze Q395 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Amaze Q395 is Rs. 4,500. The prices for both these products were updated January 24, 2020.
Report an error on this page