Compare Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 vs Micromax Canvas Mega 4G

Feature Comparison

  • The Micromax Canvas Mega 4G has 5.5 inch Screen Size, which is 27.0% more
  • Micromax Canvas Mega 4G has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Micromax Canvas Mega 4G has 83.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262
Micromax Canvas Mega 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
20 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 236 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
2MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.2 x 62.7 x 10.6 154 x 78.7 x 8.9   
Weight
121 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold, Blue   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.69GB 11.21GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 vs Micromax Canvas Mega 4G Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262Micromax Canvas Mega 4G  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 2MP13MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Micromax Canvas Mega 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 4G LTE support in India with VoLTE for Jio users
  • Decent day-to-day performance
  • Good multitasking experience, thanks to the 3GB RAM
The Bad
  • Average display sharpness
  • Outdated Android 5.1 Lollipop

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 with Micromax Canvas Mega 4G. When you see Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 Vs Micromax Canvas Mega 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 stands against Micromax Canvas Mega 4G and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Mega 4G is Rs. 7,800. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page