Compare Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 vs Panasonic P88

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Panasonic P88's is 24.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262
  • Internal Storage of Panasonic P88's is 75.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262
  • Panasonic P88's RAM is 75.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262
Panasonic P88
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
14 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.3 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 277 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6737M   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
2MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, Triple LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.2 x 62.7 x 10.6 146 x 73.25 x 8.35   
Weight
121 grams 156 grams   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold, Charcoal Grey   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories 1 Year on mobile and 6 month for Accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.69GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
No No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300) MHz   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 vs Panasonic P88 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262Panasonic P88  
Screen Size 4 inch5.3 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 2MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 with Panasonic P88. When you see Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 Vs Panasonic P88 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Star Pro Duos S7262 stands against Panasonic P88 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Panasonic P88 is Rs. 6,399. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page