Compare Samsung Galaxy Star S5282 vs Panasonic Eluga I3

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Panasonic Eluga I3's is 45.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Star S5282
  • Internal Storage of Panasonic Eluga I3's is 75.0% more than Samsung Galaxy Star S5282
  • Panasonic Eluga I3 has 2GB RAM, whereas Samsung Galaxy Star S5282 has 512MB RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Star S5282
Panasonic Eluga I3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
22 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
49 Value For Money Score
63 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
133 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-300 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
2MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
1600x1200 Pixels Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- FitHome UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
105 x 58 x 11.9 151 x 77 x 8.2   
Weight
100 grams -   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Rose Gold, Marine Blue, Champagne Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
0.62W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.77W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.8GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1200mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy Star S5282 vs Panasonic Eluga I3 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Star S5282Panasonic Eluga I3  
Screen Size 3 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 2MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1200mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Star S5282 with Panasonic Eluga I3. When you see Samsung Galaxy Star S5282 Vs Panasonic Eluga I3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Star S5282 stands against Panasonic Eluga I3 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga I3 is Rs. 7,990. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page