Compare Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 vs HTC Desire 826

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 826 has 5.5 inch Screen Size, whereas Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 has 4 inch Screen Size
  • The HTC Desire 826 has 16GB Internal Storage, which is 75.0% more
  • The HTC Desire 826's RAM measures in at 2GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 75.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392
HTC Desire 826
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
29 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
60 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Single-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
- 13MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.50 x 63.10 x 10.85 158 x 77.5 x 7.99   
Weight
124 grams 183 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White Birch, Blue Lagoon   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.27W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.28W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB 10GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 vs HTC Desire 826 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392HTC Desire 826  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP  

HTC Desire 826 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp and vivid display at 401PPI
  • Stereo speakers with BoomSOund technology
  • Smooth user interface
The Bad
  • Below average battery life
  • Heats up while performing graphic intensive tasks
  • Does not support 4G LTE

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 with HTC Desire 826. When you see Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 Vs HTC Desire 826 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 stands against HTC Desire 826 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 is currently Rs. 9,610. The lowest price for HTC Desire 826 is Rs. 9,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page