Compare Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 vs LeEco Le 1s Eco

Feature Comparison

  • LeEco Le 1s Eco has 27.0% more Screen Size
  • LeEco Le 1s Eco has 87.0% more Internal Storage
  • The LeEco Le 1s Eco's got 3GB RAM, while Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392's RAM is 512MB
 
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392
LeEco Le 1s Eco
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
18 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6795T Helio X10   
Processor Type
Single-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
- PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) , Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Touch to focus,   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- EUI 5.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.50 x 63.10 x 10.85 151.1 x 74.2 x 7.5   
Weight
124 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Gold, Silver   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.27W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.28W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB 24.4GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 vs LeEco Le 1s Eco Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392LeEco Le 1s Eco  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP13MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

LeEco Le 1s Eco Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy finish and premium metallic build
  • Vibrant 1080p Display
  • Smooth Performance
  • InfraRed Universal Remote Control Function
  • Fingerprint Sensor
The Bad
  • Average camera performance
  • Confusing User Interface

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 with LeEco Le 1s Eco. When you see Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 Vs LeEco Le 1s Eco comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 stands against LeEco Le 1s Eco and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 is currently Rs. 9,610. The lowest price for LeEco Le 1s Eco is Rs. 13,000. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page