Compare Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 vs Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392's 4 inch Screen Size
  • Both Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 and Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 have same Internal Storage
  • Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392
Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
66 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
49Value For Money
58Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 220.3 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6582M   
Processor Type
Single-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
- 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
- Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 4.2 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
121.50 x 63.10 x 10.85 145 x 73 x 9.7   
Weight
124 grams 147 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Midnight Black, White, Wine Red Black   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.27W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.28W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.05GB 2GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 vs Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP8MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP  

Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The phone can record videos in FullHD through its rear camera
  • Rear camera is good when compared to competitive devices in this price range
  • It offers expandable storage up to 32GB
The Bad
  • 1GB of RAM is insufficient for multitasking
  • Screen resolution is very low at just 960 x 540 pixels
  • Device is prone to lags due to its low power processor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 with Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114. When you see Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 Vs Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 stands against Micromax Canvas 2.2 A114 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 is currently Rs. 9,610. The prices for both these products were updated February 25, 2018.
Report an error on this page